In an article from the August 1982 issue of The Christian Science Journal titled “The Structure of The Mother Church”*, authoritative Christian Science historian Robert Peel gives details of the times when the authority of the Manual of The Mother Church has been challenged.
Here’s some background on one of those instances.
A member of the Board of Directors had been dismissed by
the Board and that person went to court. Folk interested in this difficult time
for The Mother Church would find it enlightening. The man was John V.
Dittemore. The court case was Dittemore v. Dickey. Dittemore lost his case.
In Mary Baker Eddy: The Years of Authority, Peel
tells us of Dittemore’s "final turnabout" over the matter in 1937, giving the
text of his letter to The Christian Science Board of Directors:
As
the result of experience over a period of years and a great deal of serious
study devoted to the science of government, I have come to the humble
conclusion that I made a great mistake in allowing personal differences of
opinion and the feelings that developed therefrom to influence me to the extent
which they evidently did after Mrs. Eddy passed on.
We
were all greatly affected by her demise and held divergent views regarding the
policies to be pursued when she was no longer here to direct us. And while I
acted upon convictions which I regarded as right at the time, I have since been
led to see, and am anxious to go on record as admitting it, that I was wrong in
letting personal opinion and matters of policy induce me to depart from
Principle.
God’s
law does not divide and separate men, it unites them, enabling them to work
together and perpetuates this unity. Personal differences that appear
irreconcilable disappear as we grow in the understanding of His law and the
ability to demonstrate it. Man is properly self-governed only as he enthrones
this mighty law in his heart and mind. It annihilates everything unlike itself
and I find it has destroyed all sense of personal animosity, all desire to
justify self, and brought instead the sincere desire to acknowledge my mistake
in organizing what was apparently regarded as an opposition movement, opposed
to the Cause of Christian Science, to Mrs. Eddy and her teachings.
I recognise and revere her as
having restored to humanity primitive Christian healing and acknowledge The
First Church of Christ, Scientist, in Boston, Mass., as the first church in
history to stand for the spiritual and scientific significance of the life of
Christ.
I am happy to forward you this
letter to us as you may see fit and to sincerely announce as my fervent desire
that the Cause which you represent may continue to grow and prosper under your
direction.
Mary Baker Eddy: The Years of
Authority. 509-510
In the above-mentioned Journal article, Peel wrote:
The Manual By-Laws
are laws of limitation only to such qualities as self-will, rivalry, duplicity,
sloth, pride, personal sense, and the self-deluded complacency that assumes it
has already reached Christ Jesus' pinnacle of demonstrated spirituality.
Joyce Voysey
*Ed. Anyone
wishing to read the Peel article is welcome to call their local Christian
Science Reading Room. Subscribers to JSH-Online should be able
to click the link. Anyone in Australia who would like a gift subscription
should contact the Librarian at Christian
Science Society Redcliffe.
Copies of Peel’s
book Mary Baker Eddy: Years of Authority are available for purchase or
borrowing from Christian Science Reading Rooms.