Joyce Voysey
In the marvellous account of the birth of John, his naming, and
the wonder of the people far and wide at this historic event, I found a little
something of interest. A very little something in light of the
wonderful story being told, but there we have it – my curiosity about minutiae.
Regarding the writing tablet Zacharias used to write the name of his
special son, JOHN: it seems that writing tablets were made of wood which was
covered with wax. (Bees-wax?) The picture of these reminds me of eBooks
of to-day. There could be a series of tablets which could be attached to
each other to form volumes. The writing implement was a pointed stylus.
I wonder, did Jesus write on tablets? We are told he
worked as a carpenter. Did he consult plans drawn on tablets?
Anyway, to move on to Jesus. Chapter 2 (aren’t I really
moving on?) has people scurrying all over the country to get to their home town
so that they can be taxed in a sort of census. “Scurrying” is probably
not quite accurate for the method of travel in those days. One would
expect that Mary would have had a very uncomfortable time even if she had
ridden on an ass, but maybe this was not so. After all this was no
ordinary pregnancy; this was the Christ-child.
One is reminded of Science and Health’s handling of the
process of birth on page 463; Isaiah’s wonderful promises: “I have made, and I
will bear; even I will carry, and will deliver you” (46:4), and “Before she
travailed, she brought forth; before her pain came, she was delivered of a man
child” (66:7); and Mary Baker Eddy’s handling of the birth of a child to one of
her students, Miranda Rice. This is recorded in Mary Baker Eddy
Christian Healer Amplified Edition – pp 304-304. This account
appears to have been recorded first in the third edition of Science and
Health – pp, 134-135.
Interestingly, on a personal note, one of the things that had me
thinking before I was introduced to the Science of Christianity was that
native women never had the ministrations of medical people when they gave
birth. My thinking didn’t go much deeper than that at the time, but it
was a little footstep towards the Science of Life.
About the shepherds attending the child Jesus, I have a note in
my old Bible that tells me that the flocks of sheep the shepherds were caring
for were special ones destined for temple sacrifice; the shepherds were of a
special class who could go into the temple.
Angels again providing a prophetic message to the shepherds, which good
news they “made known abroad.”
Did Luke get it direct from a personal interview with Mary that
she thought on these things and pondered them in her heart? Was she his
source for the whole story? Simeon’s
prophecy was not classed as a visit from an angel, but as revelation by the
Holy Ghost. He saw that the child Jesus was come “A light to lighten the
Gentiles, and the glory of thy people Israel.” Surely this was confirmation
for Mary and Joseph; they “marvelled at those things which were spoken of him.”
Anna the aged prophetess also spread the good news.
Were Mary and Joseph in awe at the responsibility for this
special child having been placed upon them? Were they feeling
burdened? They certainly do not seem to have understood all
his sayings even as a twelve year old. But Mary pondered them in her heart.
No comments:
Post a Comment