My
goodness. The way knowledge comes to us when we start on a path! I am currently
reading a novel about the young princess who was to become Queen Elizabeth 1. At
thirteen she has travelled (in the author's imagination) to Constantinople to
be present at a Chess Tournament which was to decide the Chess Champion of the
world – sponsored by Suleiman, the Sultan of the Ottoman (Moslem) empire. She
travelled with her beloved teacher and the English chess champion. Her father
and her tutor thought it was a good idea and she learned a lot about being a good
queen, which is the author's purpose of writing the story.
The book sometimes calls Constantinople, Byzantium! When I wrote my last blog and mentioned Byzantium, it didn't occur to
me that this was Constantinople. I had forgotten that Istanbul had been called
Byzantium before it was called Constantinople. My geography is having a good brush
up. I actually thought the city was more on the eastern side of the Bosphorus. I
love all this. The Via Egnatia trade route which seems to end in Byzantium must
have crossed the Bosphorus into Asia and joined other trade routes leading to
the Middle East and Africa, even the Silk Road to China, gathering other names
as it changed countries. Likewise from the Adriatic westward.
Perhaps
you are saying, Why doesn't she get back to I Thessalonians? OK. I
will.
The New Revised Standard Version (NRSV) points out that the praise which Paul accords the Thessalonicans (see I Thessalonians1:6-8) is unequalled in any of Paul's other letters. This is a Greek society, so Paul's purpose is very specific. He must take a different angle, addressing problems which are different from those confronting the Jewish community (which was rather in opposition to Paul's teaching). Paul's themes are marriage,
community life and engagement in civil life: rather general, but important, for
then and now.
Paul
includes Silvanus and Timothy in his initial greeting and a quick scan tells me
that he usually uses we and us rather than I.
Is this the royal
“we”? Yes, I think so. However, in chapter 2, verse 18, Paul reverts to I; and note
that his salutations conclude with "I charge you by the Lord that this
epistle be read unto all the holy brethren. The grace of our Lord Jesus
Christ be with you” (4:27, 28) - no mention of Silvanus and Timothy. (NRSV uses
“solemnly command” rather than “charge” in that first sentence.)
Paul speaks
with authority, the authority he knew he had through Christ. How important that
everyone in the community got the message! As I read the book I know I would
wish to have had my own copy of the letter. Was this done in that age? Was that a
scribe's job?
Surely
it is a recommendation to all Christians that they should be as the
Thessalonians in their work of faith, their labour of love, and
their patience of hope in our Lord Jesus Christ (1:3). We are told by Bible scholars that
this is the first time these qualities were banded together in Paul's writings. Later references occur in Rom. 5:1-5, I Cor. 13:13 and Gal. 5:5, 6. The most famous, of course, is I Cor. 13:13, the climax of his wonderful teaching on
love/charity: “And now abideth faith, hope, charity, these three; but the
greatest of these is charity.”
The beloved disciple, John, has
been mightily extolled for his teaching on love, but to read I Thessalonians is
to realise that Paul also had a mighty ability to love and teach love. Hear this:
“...though we might have made demands as apostles of Christ. But we were gentle
among you, like a nurse tenderly caring for her own children. So deeply do we
care for you that we are determined to share with you not only the gospel of
God but also our own selves, because you have become very dear to us” (I Thess. 2:7, 8
NRSV).
I find
myself wondering what Paul learned from the Thessalonians. Surely every teacher
learns much from their students.
Joyce Voysey
No comments:
Post a Comment