In its
Introduction to I Timothy, the New Revised Standard Version (NRSV) says that these letters are valuable “because of their concern with leadership
offices and pastoral oversight of the churches.”
So, I do
well to take heed of the teaching of these little letters, which scholars seem
to agree were probably not actually written by Paul. I note that I and II
Timothy are banded together with Titus and called The Pastoral Letters. (Note
for our editor: could we include Titus in this reading?)
Under a section called Language and Sources, NRSV promises that I Timothy contains lists
of vices and virtues! Also, the church and the role of women seems to be
prominent. It is noteworthy that since the coming of Christian Science, women
have been winning more influence in some mainstream churches. What a role model
women have in the life and work of Mary Baker Eddy - uncovering the Science of
Christianity, founding a church, establishing a thought-influencing newspaper
in The Christian Science Monitor.
I
rejoice to read that Timothy was considered to be “the ideal church leader,
whose sound doctrine and morals stand in sharp contrast to the corrupt lives
and words of the false teachers.” So, I feel I can compare these letters with
those written by Mary Baker Eddy to the loyal students who assisted her so
nobly in the founding of the Christian Science movement.
I guess
I need to know who the false teachers are and what they are teaching. I hope I
am ready to learn from I and II Timothy.
Joyce Voysey
No comments:
Post a Comment