I have been puzzling over the Church Manual's direction to
Readers to "make the following announcement" :
As announced in the explanatory note, I shall now
read correlative passages from the Christian Science textbook, Science and
Health with Key to the Scriptures by Mary Baker Eddy". (See pp.
120-121.)
This is required to be read by the First Reader after the Second Reader has read the Bible references of the first Section of the Bible Lesson. See Church Manual Appendix "Present Order of Services..." pp. 121, 125-6).
Why is this important, I asked myself.
Of course, we do need to know the name and author of the
book from which the Reader is reading. But if that were the only reason for
this statement, then the Reader could simply announce the name of the book and
its author without referring to the explanatory note at all.
Let's examine the afore-mentioned explanatory note. It
is found on the first leaf of the Christian Science Quarterly. (This periodical
contains the citations for each week's Bible Lesson and Sunday sermon.) The
explanatory note is profoundly important in establishing the credentials of our
Pastor: the Bible and the Christian Science textbook. It explains to the
listener that the sermon they are about to hear will comprise "Scriptural
texts" (that is, passages from the Bible) "and their correlative
passages from our denominational textbook" (that is, related or
corresponding passages from the textbook of Christian Science).
The explanatory note then amplifies the import of this
sermon. It explains that the biblical passages will be from "the canonical
writings". The dictionary defines canonical as "accepted as being
accurate and authoritative; included in the list of sacred books officially
accepted as genuine", i.e. not apocryphal.
Mrs. Eddy mentions the word canonical once in her writings,
i.e.
Have we misread the evangelical precepts and the
canonical writings of the Fathers or must we have a new Bible and a new system
of Christianity, originating not in God, but a creation of the schools - a
material religion, proscriptive, intolerant, wantonly bereft of the Word of
God. (Message to The Mother Church for 1901, Mary Baker Eddy. p. 34: 10)
The explanatory note then proceeds to inform us that
"the word of our textbook" will be "corroborating"
(confirming, giving support) and "explaining" (making clear by
describing in more details or revealing relevant facts) the Bible texts (read
by the Second Reader). Furthermore, these passages together carry a
"spiritual import" (spiritual significance) and "application to
all ages, past, present, and future" (practical use or relevance in every
age). And they "constitute" (combine to form) a sermon that is
"undivorced from truth" (not separated from truth),
"uncontaminated" (pure) and "unfettered" (not confined or
restricted) by "human hypotheses" * and "divinely
authorised" (official permission).
*Eddy refers frequently to "human hypotheses" in
her writings. For instance, in Retrospection and Introspection (p. 35:
14-15) she writes:
Human hypotheses have darkened the glow and
grandeur of evangelical religion.
And in her Message to The Mother Church for 1902 p. 5: 14-16:
The
ever-recurring human question and wonder, What is God? can never be answered
satisfactorily by human hypotheses or philosophy.
Might it be then, that the requirement to read "As
announced in the explanatory note..." will not only provide helpful
continuity for the congregation but will also reiterate and be a reminder of
the solemn import of the explanatory note.
One writer gratefully acknowledged the impact of the
explanatory note on her first visit to a Christian Science church service:
After dropping the girls off at the Sunday School,
I decided to attend the church service. Soon after I sat down, I heard the
words, "The canonical writings, together with the word of our textbook,
corroborating and explaining the Bible texts in their spiritual import and
application to all ages, past, present, and future, constitute a sermon
undivorced from truth, uncontaminated and unfettered by human hypotheses, and
divinely authorized. (See Christian Science Quarterly Bible Lessons, p. 2).
I
thought I would faint from relief. Having been exposed to nothing but human
hypotheses my entire life, from pontificating relatives, teachers, and
ministers - and being fed up with all of it - the words struck such a strong
chord I eagerly waited for what was to follow. Just hearing those words - what
I later discovered was part of the Explanatory Note preceding each Bible
Lesson-Sermon - was enough to make me feel I had been given a new lease on
life! (See The Christian Science Journal June 2010 "A revolutionary
communication" by Milika Nevarez).
What an extraordinary way to introduce our Lesson Sermons
to expectant listeners.
Julie
Swannell