Joyce Voysey
Total Pageviews
Sunday, 10 February 2013
SOJOURN in MOAB
Joyce Voysey
Sojourn – a
temporary stay; to tarry, to visit. This
must be what Elimelech and Naomi had in mind when to set off for Moab.
So, we find that Elimelech and Naomi (with their sons Mahlon
and Chilion) decided to avoid the famine and go stay temporarily in the fertile
Moab. Was the living so much easier in
Moab that they decided to continue – to settle permanently – there? This, even though as Hebrews they would not be
allowed citizenship rights, or to worship Jehovah? Was this living dangerously, to a certain
extent?
Perhaps Naomi didn’t have much say in this matter of
immigration. Or in the matter of her, perhaps weakling sons, marrying Moabitish
women. Dummelow says that Mahlon means
“sickly”, and Chilion “wasting away”. Mahlon and Chilion did indeed marry Moabitish
women – Orpah and Ruth were their names. We find that Naomi was quick to leave Moab and
get back to her own country when all the men had died.
When one knows something of the story, one is inclined to
get excited at this stage, for isn’t Ruth the great- grandmother of David? How is God going to bring that to pass? David has some Moab blood? I wonder if there are any pure blood lines in
Israel – then and now. Surely the
Israelis and the Palestinians of our day share a lot of the same ancestors. All descended from Abraham perhaps?
Anyway, are we not all children of God, not of man?
Joyce Voysey
Sojourn – a
temporary stay; to tarry, to visit. This
must be what Elimelech and Naomi had in mind when to set off for Moab.
So, we find that Elimelech and Naomi (with their sons Mahlon
and Chilion) decided to avoid the famine and go stay temporarily in the fertile
Moab. Was the living so much easier in
Moab that they decided to continue – to settle permanently – there? This, even though as Hebrews they would not be
allowed citizenship rights, or to worship Jehovah? Was this living dangerously, to a certain
extent?
Perhaps Naomi didn’t have much say in this matter of
immigration. Or in the matter of her, perhaps weakling sons, marrying Moabitish
women. Dummelow says that Mahlon means
“sickly”, and Chilion “wasting away”. Mahlon and Chilion did indeed marry Moabitish
women – Orpah and Ruth were their names. We find that Naomi was quick to leave Moab and
get back to her own country when all the men had died.
When one knows something of the story, one is inclined to
get excited at this stage, for isn’t Ruth the great- grandmother of David? How is God going to bring that to pass? David has some Moab blood? I wonder if there are any pure blood lines in
Israel – then and now. Surely the
Israelis and the Palestinians of our day share a lot of the same ancestors. All descended from Abraham perhaps?
Anyway, are we not all children of God, not of man?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
James counsels action. He writes that “faith without works is dead” (James 2:26). The Discoverer of Christian Science also commends action....
-
I have been puzzling over the Church Manual's direction to Readers to "make the following announcement" : As annou...
-
I quote here, from the Manual of The Mother Church page 132, a section of the Deed of Trust Conveying Land for Church Edifice (referring to...
No comments:
Post a Comment