Total Pageviews
Thursday, 23 July 2015
Priesthood and boldness
Hebrews 4 ends on a strong note, with the injunction to be bold, which can mean "not hesitating or fearful in the face of actual or possible danger or rebuff" (dictionary.com).
5 introduces us to Melchizedek, previously mentioned in Genesis 14 as "king of Salem" and "priest of the most high God".
The role of the Hebrew priest was to mediate between God and the people.
Julie Swannell
Work and Rest; Morning and Evening
Hebrews Chapter 4 begins on the topic of rest, which is a bit of a surprise.
So I looked up what Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures (SH) by Mary Baker Eddy has to say, but in the meantime I remembers that it says, “The highest and sweetest rest, even from a human
standpoint, is in holy work” (p. 519:28).
I
have always loved the SH definitions of day, evening,
morning, and night. So “evening” is precious with its, “Evening. Mistiness of mortal thought; weariness of mortal mind; obscured views; peace
and rest” (p. 586:1). Having worked through that in our experience, we can
then enjoy the “Light. symbol of Truth; revelation and progress” of Morning.
Having
dealt with the topic of rest, our author joyously tells us about the word of
God, which is “…quick, and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing
even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow,
and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart” (4:12). This
surely is the truth we are to know to gain that seventh day rest, and “find
grace to help in time of need” (4:16).
And
to top off the idea of rest SH gives us a definition: “…at last
we shall rest, sit down with him, in a full understanding of the divine
Principle which triumphs over death” (p. 31:20-22). The sentence begins,
“Obeying his (Jesus’) precious precepts, - following his demonstration so far
as we apprehend it, - we drink of his cup, partake of his bread, are baptized
with his purity..."
Joyce Voysey
Tuesday, 21 July 2015
Rich harmonies
I
have begun reading Hebrews over the last few days. I am reading from a King
James Version which includes a comprehensive concordance in a column down the
middle of each page. This gives me a lot of extra reading, looking up all the
cross references. But it demonstrates how well versed the author was in the
Scriptures. To read a book of the Bible in this way is like beginning with a
simple melody and then hearing rich harmonies which accompany it.
I
like reading Hebrews from the viewpoint that it could have been written by
Priscilla, whose Christly commitment, inspired faith, and generous heart must
have been so pivotal to the health and growth of the early Christian
communities. We know that she and her husband were prepared to move their
household to wherever they could be of most effective service. She was indeed a
church elder, and had been closely instructed by Paul over a period of
years.
Whoever
the author, it is immediately apparent that he / she was deeply devoted to
preserving the purity and simplicity of spiritual worship, warning their
readers against falling into ritualism, refreshing their understanding of the
distinction between Angels and Christ Jesus, alerting them to the need for
childlike obedience, defining true priesthood.
Marie Fox
Sunday, 19 July 2015
Work and rest
A recent testimony meeting included Hebrews 4: 12 which assures us of the powerful and incisive power of spiritual truth to cut to the heart of a matter. I love that the previous verses spoke to us of "rest", which might make us think about peace, relaxation, cessation of worry or complaint, or perhaps serenity and quiet. Sounds like bliss doesn't it? Well we are advised to "labour ...to enter into that rest" (verse 11). Does that remind us of the commandment that assures us that while six-sevenths of our effort goes into labour, we must remember to rest at the end, to take time to pause, remembering that God's work is already complete and perfect.
Julie Swannell
Julie Swannell
Wednesday, 15 July 2015
Encouragement and team work
The King James Version of Hebrews is tricky so I’ve been
looking at it alongside Eugene Peterson’s The Message (using the wonderful
facility on www.biblegateway.com) and
searching for key directional words as guideposts. For instance I found the
word BUT was a key word in Hebrews chapter 2.
Hebrews 2: 8 (KJV) pronounces: “Thou hast
put all things in subjection under his feet….But now we see not yet all
things put under him.” This is puzzling at first glance, however if we consider
the use of “absolute” and “relative” statements, it becomes a little clearer.
Thus it could be paraphrased: “The fact is that everything is under God’s
control (absolute statement)…But it doesn’t always appear that way
(conditional statement).”
The writer then responds with what we DO
see – and here is the main thrust of his/her message: Hebrew 2: 9 (KJV) “But
we see Jesus…” (emphasis added).
The author is building a case for the role
of Jesus as: “a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining
to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people” (verse 17).
Chapter Three uses an analogy of a house
and the house builder. Verse 4: “For every house is builded by some man; but he
that built all things is God.” Furthermore, the Son is in charge, and WE are
the house. We’d better believe it! Keep listening up here for more good news.
I like the sense of teamwork in verse 13: “But
exhort one another daily, while it is called To day; lest any of you be
hardened through the deceitfulness of sin” which is rendered “For as long as
it’s still God’s Today, keep each other on your toes so sin doesn’t slow down
your reflexes” in The Message. We can help each other.
Julie Swannnell
Tuesday, 14 July 2015
Discouragement in the Hebrew camp
Hey!
This is exciting! I have reverted to my old friend’s A Commentary on
The Holy Bible by various writers edited by Rev. J.R. Dummelow and
generally referred to as “Dummelow.” And I have found another reference
to Priscilla. In speaking of possible authors of the book, it states,
“The latest proposal is the brilliant suggestion of Harnack that the author was
Priscilla. If it were written by a woman it might have been thought in
that unenlightened age not wise to give her name. Priscilla was the chief
teacher of Apollos, an Alexandrian, and there is evidence of Alexandrian
influences in the contents of the Epistle. But the question cannot be
definitely determined.”
The next paragraph goes on about the Alexandrian
Influences and concludes that, “The whole spirit and atmosphere of Hebrews is
Alexandrian rather than Palestinian.”
I
am beginning to see a little how Mary Baker Eddy valued this book of
Hebrews. It seems to me it is pointing out the difference between
Christianity and Judaism, and her teachings show the sort of up-grading of
Christianity presented by Christian Science.
I
do like Dummelow! Here he has summed it all up for me. “The
Christians addressed are evidently in danger of falling away from their faith
and apostatising altogether. So desperate does their condition appear to
the author, that he feels it necessary to expostulate in the gravest
terms. It is no fascination of the world luring them away from their
original consecration that occasions this danger. The Hebrews are
discouraged to almost the extent of despair, because they do not see how the
gospel can offer them anything like compensation for what they have lost in
being cast out of the synagogue on account of their confession of the
Nazarene.”
Now
it is up to me to find this for myself in the text.
Joyce Voysey
Sunday, 12 July 2015
Angels
Angels play quite a prominent part in
Chapters 1 and 2. There seems to be some confusion on just what an angel is.
How thankful we are that Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures gives
us satisfactory definitions, such as on p. 581 line 4 –
ANGELS.
God’s thoughts passing to man; spiritual intuitions, pure and perfect; the
inspiration of goodness, purity, and immortality, counteracting all evil,
sensuality, and mortality. S&H 581:4.
The passage on angels in the chapter Science
of Being (p. 298:25-17) deserves to be quoted in full:
Angels
are not etherealised human beings, evolving animal qualities in their wings;
but they are celestial visitants, flying on spiritual, not material pinions.
Angels are pure thoughts from God, winged with Truth and Love, no matter what
their individualism may be. Human conjecture confers upon angels its own forms
of thought, marked with superstitious outlines, making them human creatures
with suggestive feathers; but this is only fancy. It has behind it no more
reality than has the sculptor’s thought when he carves his “Statue of Liberty,”
which embodies his conception of an unseen quality or condition, but which has
no physical antecedent reality save in the artist’s own observation and
“chambers of imagery.”
My
angels are exalted thoughts, appearing at the door of some sepulchre, in which
human belief has buried its fondest earthly hopes. With white fingers they point
upward to a new and glorified trust, to higher ideals of life and its joys.
Angels are God’s representatives. These upward-soaring beings never lead to
self, sin, or materiality, but guide to the divine Principle of all good,
whither every real individuality, image, or likeness of God, gathers. By giving
earnest heed to these spiritual guides they tarry with us, and we entertain
“angels unawares.”
How good it is to be reminded of those
truths! And to know that in the words from hymn number nine from the Christian Science Hymnal,
O
longing hearts that wait on God
Through
all the world so wide;
He
knows the angels that you need,
And
sends them to your side,
To
comfort, guard and guide.
Yes. God knows the angels which each
one of His children needs and does provide them with grace and glory in the
oneness of His being.
Joyce Voysey
Studying Hebrews
Hello!
Hello! Harper Collins New Revised Standard Version (NRSV) of the Bible
states that early Christian leaders such as Barnabas, Apollos, and Priscilla
have been mentioned as possible authors of Hebrews. Here is that
woman I had heard about - maybe! Regarding the ‘letter’ matter, the NRSV states that
the book does end with a letter and that the final paragraphs give the
possibility of it having been sent to far off recipients. The last
paragraph does seem to indicate that Paul had something to do with this
communication – the mention of Timothy and Italy… I
wonder if some day the author will be revealed?
NRSV suggests that the
Greek in which this book was written is among the most sophisticated in the New Testament.
Eugene Petersen offers a different angle on the book in his introduction in The Message. Here he says that it tells us we can get too religious! And when that happens it is time
to re-read and study afresh this precious book.
Joyce Voysey
Wednesday, 8 July 2015
July. Book: Hebrews
I began by reading what my Harper Collins Bible Dictionary
has to say about the book, then The New, New Testament.
I had been aware that Paul is not considered to be the author
of the book, and that no other author has been named. I read somewhere that
the idea that it was written by a woman, and therefore it was not to be
acknowledged as such, was put forward. I rather like that idea, though
Madelon Maupin seemed to disregard it when I mentioned it.
The Bible dictionary says the work reads like a homily rather
than a letter, and The New New Testament suggests a teaching or a
sermon. It speaks of some of the text as introducing Greek philosophy.
So, I wondered what that wonderful and inspired student of the
Bible, Mary Baker Eddy has to say about Hebrews. From memory I gather
that she was very impressed by some of it. For instance, quotes appear in her work Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures in the chapter Recapitulation, in response to the question "What is substance?" Here she quotes from the remarkable chapter 11 (on faith): “The substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not
seen.” See S&H p. 468 and Hebrews ch. 11, particularly verse 1.
Again, in Science and Health, on page 112: 19-20, we find
reference to Hebrews 13: 8 “[Jesus Christ] the same yesterday, and to-day, and
forever.” The marginal heading here is Unchanging Principle, and
refers to the divine Principle of healing in Christian Science, and the
Christ-idea.
Further on, on page 313, in reference to Jesus the Christ, we find
Hebrews 1:9 quoted as poetry:
Therefore God, even thy God, hath anointed thee
With the oil of gladness above they fellows.
Biblical phrases resonated with Mrs. Eddy, so that they were
part of her language. She borrows once more from Hebrews (11:10) on p. 575: 12-13) as follows: “a city that hath
foundations,” when speaking about the New Jerusalem.
Joyce Voysey
Tuesday, 7 July 2015
God's Son
Our July book is Hebrews, from the New Testament. I have opened a couple of different translations and read the first couple of verses from Chapter One where the author (scholars have ruled out Paul for this book) immediately takes us to God. How has God communicated thus far? Through the prophets. But now we have God's Son.
The Living Bible tells us "God's Son shines out with God's glory" (verse 3) while the New Revised Standard Version translates the original Greek as "He is the reflection of God's glory and the exact imprint of God's very being" and Eugene Petersen offers "This Son perfectly mirrors God, and is stamped with God's nature" (The Message).
I love the shiny nature, even luminosity, of these descriptions.
Julie Swannell
The Living Bible tells us "God's Son shines out with God's glory" (verse 3) while the New Revised Standard Version translates the original Greek as "He is the reflection of God's glory and the exact imprint of God's very being" and Eugene Petersen offers "This Son perfectly mirrors God, and is stamped with God's nature" (The Message).
I love the shiny nature, even luminosity, of these descriptions.
Julie Swannell
Wednesday, 1 July 2015
What joy
Possibly one of the most noteworthy aspects of the building of
the Extension of The Mother Church is the fact that it was completed in 2 years
from the laying of the corner stone. (See page 67 of As Chronicled by
the Newspapers.) Having just read about the building of the Cologne
Cathedral, which went on for many, many centuries (about 6) and was finished in
1880, and knowing that the building of the Anglican Cathedral in Brisbane was
executed between the years 1906 and 2009, I can appreciate the magnitude of the
task. Though, of course, the Christian Science church is a simple
building in comparison.
When I think of the interior of the two types of buildings, a circle and a straight line come to mind, the circle having an embracing
feel to it. Page 71 gives us a nice piece on the Unique Interior.
Fancy there being space for 5,000 people to move freely in the
foyer!
And, the demonstrations that must have been made to accomplish
the perfection recorded in the newspapers of the time!
Then there were testimony meetings – I count 9 places where
they were held! What a privilege to be present at one of those!
What joy!
Joyce Voysey
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
James counsels action. He writes that “faith without works is dead” (James 2:26). The Discoverer of Christian Science also commends action....
-
I have been puzzling over the Church Manual's direction to Readers to "make the following announcement" : As annou...
-
I quote here, from the Manual of The Mother Church page 132, a section of the Deed of Trust Conveying Land for Church Edifice (referring to...